Wny the flip flop? – Letter to editor

It is refreshing to see HBRC staff being prepared to change their minds over the additional $43 million spend on the dam. However it does draw into question how they got the issue of consultation so wrong in the first place. One has to wonder how at one meeting a $43 million spend can been seen as insignificant yet at the very next meeting the opposite holds true. After all these are very highly paid individuals making these recommendations and to completely ignore their own Significance and Engagement Policy must bring into question either their competence, or undue outside influence.

As an indication, to my mind the original recommendation from staff had Andrew Newman’s fingerprints all over it. Let us not forget for one moment that Andrew Newman retains responsibility for staff contracts at HBRC meaning they have a sword of Damocles continuously hanging over them. I can’t imagine this is a pleasant situation to be in, and is something that I believe has clearly influenced decisions that should have gone against Andrew Newman’s wishes. How else is this flip flop explained?

Submitted 15 March 2016

This entry was posted in Dam, HB Today, Letters to Editor, Water and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s